The banks are finding new ways to make it more difficult to withdraw our money. Bliss street, across from the building that used to house the Australian embassy.
An expanding white cloud that strikes with the sudden force of stampeding elephants, followed by tremors, shrieks, and smoke, and leaving you with rubble, a hangover, vague foreign associations, and broken glass.
in a fragile highball glass filled with ice:
one shot Laphroaig or similarly very smoky Scotch
Two or the remaining volume with Amarula cream liqueur for the slight bitterness (or Bailey’s for the associations of confessional conflicts)
My broken laboratory window rendered beautifully by ToonCamera, the view (south), my fourth and hopefully final attempt at “temporary” repair, worse and much more expensive glass former windows at the hospital (one fell just after we passed), and frangipani blossoms on the lawn outside the laboratory (the fallen can be beautiful). They have a very nice scent.
After removing all the glass from the frame and inside, I thought to leave it “as is” because the ledge above prevents rain from entering, the bats rarely visited when I left the windows open, and flies and mosquitoes (I am very aware that mosquitoes are also true flies, but) are sufficiently few (that sounds like a natural oxymoron of the same class as “almost enough”). I had neglected to realize the window also prevented hot, humid air entering from outside, and some experiments require “room” temperature and the absence of perspiration contamination. Thus, I recalled the sheet polyethylene from the dust rain project, recalled to whom I gave it, recovered a few meters, and taped it to the empty frame. The next morning it was lying rumpled. Repeat with more tape. Again, the morning collapse. Again, with intent. It held.
About this time, about a week after the explosion (I often thoughtlessly refer to it as a bomb {and Wikipedia has finally settled on “2020 Beirut explosion” after provisionally titling with “explosions” [hopefully they will not have to change the title again due to additional explosions], though with some Czech ancestry, I prefer “The Great Defenestration of Beirut” in hope it will be extended to the political system), our residence had all 17 broken windows repaired, and the university announced someone (actually the fifth: me, the building manager, dean’s office person, a facilities person, and a physical plant rep), would be visiting each room in the next week to asses damage in order to prepare a report to present to her boss, who would collate all such reports to provide to the administration, who would…. From this timeliness and that the beginning of the semester is being delayed by one week, I inferred my plastic cover-up may have to endure more than a few days, and reinforced it with battens collected some years ago in thought that they may be useful. The window certainly should not be a priority. Rumors include that France is sending 300,000 square meters, that Syria (probably closest factory) has increased production four-fold, and that the university decided to replace broken glass with far-more-expensive safety glass. So, months, and if someone monitoring the finances notices, better never. The official visitor asked an important question, “Is that crack above your desk new?” Indeed, it is one of several, so I will hope I am not banned from my office for my own safety. One should always have an exit strategy.
Since the disturbing quote by Johnathan Oppenheim (see post “Under a Red Cloud”) about the thickness of the present, I find myself dwelling on strange ideas whenever the subject of time arises. Here, while installing the plastic sheet, I looked to the ledge below, thinking if it would provide convenient purchase. Surprisingly unexpected, my window had littered it with shards as well. I thought it would be ill-advised to clamber down and collect it for disposal. Then I thought of how many years the shards could stay there as vestiges of the Great Defenestration of Beirut. Probably until the building is demolished, which, in consideration of the financial situation, could be beyond my passing.
There is a set of bins up the street where we deposit our daily waste. There is another set a hundred meters or so up the street, and then another, and some on parallel streets. Beirutis produce much solid waste. At our local collection and recycling venue (the bins get picked through multiple times by various rubbish gleaners), there are eight or so bins, and most are green with a “Ramco” stencil. The Ramco guys come with their truck three or four times a day, including a late night collection that lasts fifteen to twenty minutes and, in the pre-thawra, pre-Covid-19, pre-port explosion era, engendered a long line of impatient night-lifers who honked and honked. The strangest aspect is the honking does not bother us. A few years ago, Ramco won the contract over Sukleen, which had had the contract for many (ten, fifteen, twenty?) years. I recall reading an interview with the director of Sukleen, who said that half of his business expenses were bribes. One begins to realize the corruption in Lebanon. I also recall the arrival of Ramco with a convoy of newly painted, white trucks in on the corniche. Presumably, most of the equipment and employees were transferred from Sukleen. Recently, the frontline Ramco workers, largely Bangladeshi, went on strike over wages. Their contract (unlike mine) is in US dollars, because they are working here to send money home. When the city started paying Ramco in local currency (because that is what they have, being part of the government), they went on strike for a few days. The government exchange rate was far worse than the market, and their remittances were reduced to nearly nothing. It was like the garbage crisis of a few years ago. I read a story with interviews with workers. It mentioned their meals at the work camp lately included meat or fish only once a week. Vegetables and rice. Carrots figured prominently. It sounded like prison. The workcamp (I have stop myself from assuming it is a euphemism) was named (what I cannot recall), but I could not find it on a map and no one had heard of it. I assume it is in Karantina because that is where I would always see Sukleen trucks. Karantina is a few hundred meters east of the explosion and not shielded (perhaps augmented) by the silos. There is some sort of military hospital there, but the neighborhood, largely non-residential, must have (and did) suffered badly.
Tuesday, there having been a the port explosion, Ramco did not come to collect the garbage in the evening. Wednesday was filled with the sound of glass being knocked out and swept up, a horrible grating sound always and now again associated with disaster. The area of windows broken must be multiple square kilometers, if our neighborhood, four kilometers from the blast, is littered with piles of glass. Thursday they did not come, and I did not know whether to assume they were busy elsewhere or whether they suffered many casualties. Friday they did not come, and the garbage began to encroach on the road. Saturday afternoon, bobcats (those little bulldozers) were dropped off at the neighborhood collection sites (suggesting a fleet on call?), and garbage men finally came, but not the Bangladeshis, Lebanese. It took them more than three hours just for our site.
Sunday, eerily quiet, but blessedly without the sound of glass. By the way, floor-to-ceiling glass is elegant, but think of the cleaning before choosing it.
Acknowledgements to William Carlos Williams for his poem, “The Red Wheelbarrow.”
Some are convinced that the 4 August 2020 explosion involved an aerial attack, that there was a missile, despite none being apparent in the many video recordings. One might reasonably suspect an agenda, or several, motivating the creation and propagation of such conspiracy theories.
The port example confused me, as I heard very clearly what sounded as if a supersonic jet or missile passed directly over our apartment toward the port, first jolting the building with its sonic boom and ending in the very loud blast that hurt my ears and broke windows. Soon after, when someone said it was an Israeli missile, it seemed not only plausible, it seemed the only plausible explanation. Yet it is now clear that if a missile was involved, it did not streak at supersonic speed just above our apartment, and what I heard was not it.
This was a puzzle, and lying in bed thinking about the events of the day (auspiciously starting with a long wait at the bank [while the friendly staff spent the 30 minutes between the posted opening and “new” opening hours chatting over coffee and ignoring the line at the door — and when finally letting us first two customers in, they still needed ten more minutes, despite having at least 15 employees] successful in reducing our holdings to the cost of bottle of Scotch and collecting the new card so necessary in the relentless battle to extract my salary from their cold vaults), I reviewed what I could recall from the beginning: standing in the middle of the apartment with all windows open, a strong jolt, the sound of something large rushing at high speed east toward the port, my spouse dragging me to the interior, the very loud sound of the explosion, and a few minutes later standing on glass shards downstairs, the sight of the red cloud rising and roiling as it drifted south.
The videos show the flash of the explosion, the transient condensation of a sphere of fog, and the blast front radiating and shattering windows, and close to the origin, shedding facades.
I have an explanation reconciling my experience with the documentation (see figures). At time zero, a large explosion occurs. The ground shock radiates very fast, something on the order of 3500 meters per second, depending on the bedrock, here, karst. Meanwhile, the sound of the blast travels through the air about one-tenth the speed, something close to 350 meters per second (we could find an accurate number for 80% humidity, sea level, 30 Celsius). Thus, for me, about 4000 meters west of the site, the jolt comes just after one second from time zero. Indeed, there was no sound before the jolt that I can recall. There could have been distant Israeli military jets, but those have been so common recently that I hardly notice unless they are near Beirut. Immediately after the jolt (as if a truck hit the building, but I cannot recall a directionality), there was the rushing, whistling sound of something moving very fast due east toward the port. Then, about ten seconds after the jolt (the rushing sound having receded and faded), the air pressure wave arrived with its concomitant very loud boom and broke windows. In our building, some were sucked out and some were blown in. So, between the jolt and the boom, what could have so rapidly moved from here toward the port causing the rushing whistling noise? Imagine the jolt, the rapidly radiating ground shockwave, emitting noise by shaking buildings as it travels. Immediately after the jolt, one hears the sound the jolted buildings emitted just upstream, then earlier and further away (reversed in both time and space), all the way back to the origin, which is the arrival of the boom. To understand this, imagine the speed of sound is precisely 350 m/s, the speed of the jolt through the ground is precisely 3500 m/s, and you the observer are 3500 meters from the origin. At time=1 second, the explosion occurs at the origin, and if in line of sight, you might see it, but no jolt or sound will have arrived. At time=2 second, the jolt arrives silently (no sound has arrived yet). At time=3 second, you hear sound of the jolt rattling buildings 350 m closer to the origin. At time=4 second, you hear the jolt rattling buildings 700 m closer to the origin, but the sound is fainter as it is more distant. At time=5, 6, 7, 8, 9 seconds, the sound emitted by the propagating jolt has receded almost to the origin. At time=10 second, the very loud boom of the explosion arrives and breaks windows. Thus, between the jolt and boom (would have been a good title reminiscent of Aravind Adiga’s excellent “Between the Assassinations”), you would hear the jolt moving faster than the speed of sound toward the port ending with the boom, reasonably interpreted as a supersonic air attack by jet or missile.
There are other origins of conspiracy theories to consider. Logic, especially in the service of pre-formed conclusions. Imagine this: Who has the most to gain from the destruction of the port of Beirut? China! Why China? Because China will be willing to rebuild the port in return for recouping costs, just like its deal with Sri Lanka. We all heard Hassan Nasrallah advocating seeking investment from the East, even specifically mentioning China. Thus, concluding a motive, we only need evidence (or to substitute a plausible concoction) and mechanism. China, wanting the port contract, discovers there is a very large store of ammonium nitrate stored in warehouse 12, leaks to Israel that Hezbollah has a cache of super-advanced missiles. Israel sneaks its agents into the port to plant a bomb to detonate the ammonium nitrate and obliterate the port. Some elaborations of this can involve the Russians abandoning the cargo, or Hezbollah preventing the removal of the ammonium nitrate in order to create an anti-Israeli Maginot in the south, or anti-Hezbollah parties causing the explosion to blame it on Hezbollah, to disrupt income to Amal, or to profit from the rebuilding. Or agents of the port in Tripoli. Or the Egyptian rice lobby, as there is no place to store wheat.
And how are these theories propagated? They are circulated innocently, with malice, for fun, or as exploration of possibilities, by all means, and as in the game of “broken telephone,” mutate, diverge, and become extinct, and the relationship to the truth is irrelevant.